John Charet’s Take On: Elgar (1962)

Along with Always on Sunday, Elgar may be the most accessible of director Ken Russell’s television documentaries/docudramas on famous historical artists during his years at the BBC (1959-1970). Far from damning it with faint praise though, I am actually lauding Elgar as the perfect one for viewers to start with.

On the surface, Elgar plays out as a conventional television documentary on a celebrated artist. In this case, it would be that of British composer Edward Elgar (1857-1934). Throughout it’s 56 minute running time, we get all of the interesting details about him; courtesy of BBC broadcaster Huw Wheldon (1916-1986), who serves as the program’s narrator. Basically, the viewer is treated to everything from his upbringing to the last years of his life.

Like all of director Ken Russell’s television films, Elgar is a masterpiece of both form and content. Unlike a majority of his later work, Elgar sticks merely to the facts. At first glance, this approach may seem shockingly reverential for diehard Russell fans like myself. Fortunately, this fear is more than overshadowed by Russell’s visual approach to storytelling.

Aside from partly dramatizing British composer Edward Elgar’s life through a re-enactment (though with no dialogue whatsoever), director Ken Russell further celebrates it by employing his compositions as background music throughout. Russell’s use of dissolves and voiceovers evokes legendary American filmmaker Orson Welles back-to-back masterpieces of Citizen Kane (1941) and The Magnificent Ambersons (1942). In fact, some of the techniques displayed in those last two titles, were borrowed from filmmakers associated with the French New Wave movement. One perfect example comes from esteemed French filmmaker Francois Truffaut in his 1962 classic Jules and Jim. Similar to Elgar, Truffaut employed newsreel footage, photographic stills and voiceovers to visually tell part of the story. Nevertheless, this is where Elgar’s similarities to Jules and Jim end.

Not unlike most of director Ken Russell’s work, Elgar (in some ways) unofficially feels like a semi-autobiographical account of Russell himself. While he may not have been born and raised as one, like British composer Edward Elgar was, Russell did convert to Roman Catholicism during the 1950’s (read here). Even with all of the cinematic influences he carried around with him (Die Nibelungen and The Secret of the Loch), Russell (like Elgar) was professionally self-taught. Even though this can’t be confirmed with any kind of authenticity, Russell (as with Elgar) may have detested large-scale wars as well; or at least war for war’s sake. Though still horrified by the prospect of World War I (1914-1918) itself, Elgar did compose a few patriotic pieces for the effort (read here) and joined the Volunteer Reserves on the side. Though, as the war went on, Elgar became disillusioned with it. During this time, he had also hoped that A.C. Benson’s nationalistic lyrics for his composition of Land of Hope and Glory would get axed (read here). Russell, on the other hand, joined the Royal Air Force and was a merchant marine during his teenage years (read here). Neither of these stints lasted very long though. A perfect example of Russell’s unconfirmed anti-war position comes during a battlefield sequence. Here, a large number of soldiers are getting killed and wounded set to the music of Elgar’s well-known Pomp and Circumstance Marches. The uplifting tone of the composition is intended to sharply contrast with the horrors of war being presented to the viewer. This may be Russell’s way of thumbing his nose at imperialism. Russell’s view can also apply to that of both America’s involvement in both Vietnam and Iraq. Even though both Elgar and Russell were more or less appreciated in their time, this is only to an extent. Germany may have been the first country to recognize Elgar’s genius, but the British press did finally catch up; even If it seemed more muted when he was alive (read here and here). Nevertheless, while Elgar was at least knighted during his lifetime, neither of Russell’s films have ever been truly appreciated by the majority of critics. As of 2019, Women in Love serves as the only film of his to have earned a spot on the BFI’s Top 100 British Films list. While far from completely alike, Elgar and Russell both came off as reclusive (or semi-reclusive) artists, who were actually gentle at heart. Despite the way he is often portrayed in the press (read here), which include, but not limited to, his appearance on Big Brother, Russell actually comes off as a very articulate and intelligent man based on his interviews alone.

Director Ken Russell may have gone on to make even better films within and out of television, but If you are looking for a rather fitting introduction to his cinematic resume, Elgar is not a bad place to start at all. Visually, we are treated to only one of many important aspects of his style, while at the same time, witnessing how one important artist of the past century personally connect to that of another.

-(Star Rating)-
* * * * (Out of * * * *)

P.S. If you are interested in watching the whole film, here are four links to it below:

The link to the first part

The link to the second part

The link to the third part

The link to the fourth part


10 thoughts on “John Charet’s Take On: Elgar (1962)

  1. It’s a long time since I watched it, but I do recall that ‘Soviet-style’ being impressive. That certainly stayed in my memory, so must have made some impact on me as a teenager.
    Best wishes, Pete.

  2. Wonderful review John. I agree along with ‘Song of Summer’ this a great place to start with Ken’s work. Yes, he was a very quiet man except on set sometimes I believe. Rather shy. I read he used to play up to the Press’ view on him. But he did beat Alexander Walker (film critic Evening Standard newspaper in London) around the head once on a TV chat show with a rolled up copy of his review for insulting The Devils:

  3. Interestingly enough, Ken Russell has reportedly labeled Song of Summer as his personal favorite of all of his films

    I know I should not feel this way, but I actually kind of rooted for Ken Russell after I read that he hit Alexander Walker with a rolled up copy of his review. It is one thing not to like the film, but I personally feel (based on what I have read) that Walker was being unfair to him. And Leslie Halliwell proved to be every bit as ignorant about him as Walker was. I understand that both critics have different tastes and I do not hate them (on the contrary, I respect both Walker and Halliwell, despite my disagreements with them), but they fail at being articulate when it comes to Ken Russell. I of course would not have done what he did, but I can’t really blame him when the press kept treating him like crap. I know Ken did not care what others thought, but it annoys me when they don’t even make an attempt to understand him. Anyway, keep dropping by 🙂

  4. Hi John. Just dropping by your site. I’m afraid I don’t have anything to contribute to your astute posts as I know nothing about Elgar or Russell. I enjoyed reading though.

    I haven’t watch anything new lately. I did rewatch the Hounds of Love a couple of weeks ago. It’s a difficult film, reminiscent in many ways of Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, though not as violent. It’s an impressive debut for the director (can’t think of his name off the top of my head.)

    There are a few films I want to revisit: The Pledge starring Jack Nicholson, directed by Sean Penn, The Proposition (the Australian film),The Friends of Eddie Coyle and The Silence (the German film). About the only new movies I’m interested in are Vice and Roma.

    Hope your doing well.

  5. That is perfectly fine Pam 🙂 I left that comment on your site just to see how you have been since you stopped blogging 🙂 I do that every once a month. Not more than that because that would be overdoing it of course 🙂 Hounds of Love sounds interesting. Anyway, thanks for dropping by 🙂

    P.S. I love The Pledge, The Proposition, The Friends of Eddie Coyle. Have not seen The Silence yet though. According to you though it is a German film. I love all kinds of cinema 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s