• About Me
  • John Charet’s Favorite Westerns
  • My 235 Favorite Directors of All-Time (Alphabetical Order)

cinematiccoffee

~ Fine Conversations About Cinema

cinematiccoffee

Category Archives: Mystery

My Favorite Lucio Fulci Films

26 Thursday Mar 2020

Posted by John Charet in 1960's Cinema, 1970's Cinema, 1980's Cinema, Cinema, Film Directors, French Cinema, Greatest, Horror, Italian Cinema, Italian Filmmakers, Lists, Mystery, Spanish Cinema, Thriller, Western

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

A Lizard in a Woman's Skin, Don't Torture a Duckling, Four of the Apocalypse, Massacre Time, One on Top of the Other (a.k.a. Perversion Story), The Beyond

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   The Beyond (1981)

2.   Four of the Apocalypse (1975)

3.   Massacre Time (1966)

* * * 1/2 (Out of * * * *)

1.   Don’t Torture a Duckling (1972)

2.   A Lizard in a Woman’s Skin (1971)

3.   One on Top of the Other (1969)
(a.k.a. Perversion Story)

My Favorite Richard Fleischer Films

24 Tuesday Mar 2020

Posted by John Charet in 1940's Cinema, 1950's Cinema, 1960's Cinema, 1970's Cinema, Action, Adventure, American Cinema, American Filmmakers, Biography, British Cinema, Cinema, Comedy, Crime, Drama, Family, Film Directors, Film Noir, Greatest, History, Lists, Mystery, Richard Fleischer, Romance, Science Fiction, Thriller

≈ 10 Comments

Tags

10 Rillington Place, 20000 Leagues Under the Sea 1954, Compulsion, Mandingo, So This Is New York, The Boston Strangler, The Girl in the Red Velvet Swing, The Narrow Margin, The Vikings, Violent Saturday

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   Mandingo (1975)

2.   The Narrow Margin (1952)

3.   The Boston Strangler (1968)

4.   10 Rillington Place (1971)

5.   The Vikings (1958)

6.   20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954)

* * * 1/2 (Out of * * * *)

1.   Compulsion (1959)

2.   The Girl in the Red Velvet Swing (1955)

3.   Violent Saturday (1955)

4.   So This Is New York (1948)

My Favorite Alfonso Cuaron Films

17 Tuesday Mar 2020

Posted by John Charet in 1990's Cinema, 2000's Cinema, 2010-Present Cinema, Adventure, Alfonso Cuaron, American Cinema, British Cinema, Cinema, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Film Directors, Greatest, Lists, Mexican Cinema, Mexican Filmmakers, Mystery, Science Fiction, Thriller

≈ 13 Comments

Tags

A Little Princess, Children of Men, Gravity, Roma, Y Tu Mama Tambien

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   Roma (2018)

2.   Gravity (2013)

3.   Children of Men (2006)

4.   Y Tu Mama También (2001)

* * * 1/2 (Out of * * * *)

1.   A Little Princess (1995)

My Favorite John Huston Films

15 Wednesday Jan 2020

Posted by John Charet in 1940's Cinema, 1950's Cinema, 1970's Cinema, Adventure, American Cinema, American Filmmakers, British Cinema, Cinema, Comedy, Crime, Drama, Film Directors, Film Noir, Greatest, John Huston, Lists, Mystery, Sport, Thriller, Top 314

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

Fat City, The Asphalt Jungle, The Maltese Falcon, The Man Who Would Be King, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, Wise Blood

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   Wise Blood (1979)

2.   The Maltese Falcon (1941)

3.   Fat City (1972)

* * * 1/2 (Out of * * * *)

1.   The Man Who Would Be King (1975)

2.   The Asphalt Jungle (1950)

3.   The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

John Charet’s Take On: The Birds (1963)

18 Thursday Oct 2018

Posted by John Charet in 1960's Cinema, Alfred Hitchcock, American Cinema, American Filmmakers, British Filmmakers, Cinema, Film Directors, Greatest, Horror, Mystery, Thriller

≈ 20 Comments

Tags

1963, Alfred Hitchcock, The Birds

Warning: The review contains potential plot spoilers. If you have not seen this film than I advise you to not read any further.

Three years after he reinvented cinematic horror with Psycho in 1960, director Alfred Hitchcock (a.k.a. The Master of Suspense) would return to that genre in 1963 to do it again; this time with something more ambitious and on a much larger scale as well. The finished result was The Birds and with it, Hitchcock succeeded in not only equaling and surpassing his aforementioned previous effort, but at the same time, everything he did before and after this. If I were to compose two lists of my top 100 or more favorite films of all-time; with one dedicated to the horror genre and the other towards cinema as a whole, I would place The Birds at the number 1 spot on the former and somewhere in between numbers 1 and 10 on the latter.

While visiting an urban pet store one day to pick up a mynah bird for a relative, San Francisco socialite Melanie Daniels (Tippi Hedren) gets mistaken by a customer (Rod Taylor) for a saleswoman and requests a pair of lovebirds for his little sister’s 11th birthday party. As with the mynah bird, it turns out that the shop is out of lovebirds, so Melanie suggests a canary, which flies out of her hand after taking it out of it’s cage. After catching the canary with his hat, the still unnamed customer places the bird back in it’s cage and says: “back in your gilded cage Melanie Daniels.” A stunned Daniels asks him how he knew her name and it is revealed that he saw her in court. According to him, she was responsible for a practical joke that resulted in a broken glass window and personally feels that she should have been sent to jail for it. He purposely knew from the very beginning that Daniels was no saleswoman and reveals that it was his way of reminding her of “what it’s like to be on the other end of a gag” as he puts it. Undetered by not getting his lovebirds, he leaves with two closing remarks to Daniels: “I’ll find something else” and “see ya in court.” An annoyed Daniels decides to write down the number of the license plate on that customer’s car and calls the Department of Motor Vehicles to find out the name of the individual who owns it. In an attempt to get even with him, Daniels asks the pet shop owner to order a pair of lovebirds for her and have them delivered as soon as possible, which in this case would be the next morning.

The next day, Melanie Daniels arrives at the apartment building to place a birdcage (with the two lovebirds inside) on a doorstep with a note addressing that customer’s real name as “Mr. Mitchell Brenner.” Before leaving, a neighbor of his reminds her that he is visiting Bodega Bay, which is up the coast from San Francisco. Eager to get even with Mitch, Melanie drives up there and visits a local store to see If it’s owner knows where Mitch is residing for the weekend. Coincidentally, he knows the location of the place, which is across the dock seen close by. He knows that it belongs to his mother, but when asked about Mitch’s younger sister, he cannot seem to remember her first name. Nevertheless, he is able to direct her to a local schoolteacher by the name of Annie Hayworth (Suzanne Pleshette), who not only teaches Mitch’s younger sister, but also reveals herself to be Mitch’s ex-lover much later on. Upon learning that Cathy is the name of Mitch’s younger sibling, Melanie rents a motorboat to get to Mitch’s house to deliver her surprise. After placing the caged lovebirds on a comfy chair, Melanie tears up her original note for Mitch and replaces it with one carrying the words “To: Cathy” on it. Unofficially, Melanie hopes to shock Mitch with her knowledge of a family member’s identity much in the same way he did with hers the day before. Melanie rushes out of the house and back to her motorboat to see how Mitch will react when he inevitably goes back inside. Seemingly amused and curious, Mitch drives to the other side of the dock and gets out of his car to see what she will either say to him or do next. Suddenly, a seagull flies down and quickly attacks Melanie on the forehead prompting Mitch to help her out of the boat and treat her wound.

At the local diner, while treating her injury, Mitch Brenner reveals to Melanie Daniels that he is a criminal defense attorney, who practices law in San Francisco, but comes to Bodega Bay on the weekends to relax. After asking her why she is in the area, Melanie tells a lie and a half. Considering that Mitch is unaware of it being a prank yet humored and touched by the deed at the same time, Melanie tells him that she wanted to deliver the lovebirds for his little sister’s birthday. Deep down though, Melanie saw Mitch as a potential boyfriend ever since that first coincidental meeting at the pet store the day before. Even though Melanie denies it publicly, Mitch personally feels that she is in Bodega Bay to see him. Is it possible that Mitch could care less about her earlier prank and only got even with her that previous day so she could come to Bodega Bay to see him?  The other lie Melanie tells Mitch is that she is visiting to see local schoolteacher Annie Hayworth (a.k.a. his ex-lover) by claiming that she and her were friends during their college years.  Later that night, Melanie reluctantly accepts Mitch’s invitation to dinner to meet his younger sister Cathy (Veronica Cartwright), who adores both Melanie and the lovebirds she bought her and his widowed mother Lydia (Jessica Tandy), who initially fears her presence. As Ms. Daniels is about to leave to spend the night with Annie, a curious Mitch asks her to talk a bit more about herself in regards to a story brought up by Lydia earlier regarding Melanie frolicking naked in a waterfall while vacationing in Rome, Italy. Melanie claims that she was dumped in there with her clothes on and that the article his mother was referring to was written by a columnist hired by a rival of her father’s newspaper company to slander her family. Still unsatisfied, Mitch wants to know why she lied to him about knowing Annie resulting in an already annoyed Melanie to quickly drive away from him for a short period of time.

Later on at Annie Hayworth’s house, a curious Melanie Daniels asks Annie about her past relationship with Mitch Brenner, whom she was madly in love with at one time. According to Annie, she still desires a romantic relationship with him, but his overprotective mother Lydia just kept getting in the way and it eventually proved to be too much for her to take. Suddenly, Mitch phone calls Melanie to sincerely apologize for his earlier behavior and to make it up to her, he decides to officially invite her to celebrate his little sister Cathy’s 11th birthday party for the following day. Thinking back and forth for a while, Melanie decides to go. Shortly before both of them go to bed, a loud noise is heard from the outside. After opening the door to see what it is, Annie and Melanie discover a dead seagull on the front step. This is just the third strange occurrence that has plagued Bodega Bay since Melanie arrived. The first incident came earlier in the form of a seagull briefly attacking Melanie on the forehead and the second one involved the town’s chicken feed and why the chickens were not eating it. The next day at Cathy’s birthday party, numerous birds begin to violently attack the party guests and shortly after that, Mitch fends off a bird attack within his own home. From here on out, these incidents prove to be just two of the numerous attacks the birds will launch on the town and it’s inhabitants.

On the surface, The Birds plays out as a standard horror film about humans being attacked by the title villains. Nevertheless, in the hands of it’s iconic director and producer Alfred Hitchcock, it inevitably goes much deeper than that. Along with Vertigo and Psycho, this one requires viewers to pay close attention to every single detail that unfolds on screen from beginning to end. Not unlike what he had achieved with those two classics, Hitchcock proves once again here that the power of cinematic storytelling lies not so much in the payoff as it does in the buildup. While this can easily be said about any of the master filmmaker’s best work, it is in The Birds where Hitchcock finds himself reaching his fullest expression of that particular trait.

As much as I adore Jamaica Inn and Rebecca, The Birds still ranks for me as my favorite of director Alfred Hitchcock’s three film adaptations of a Daphne du Maurier property. Instead of merely adapting du Maurier’s 1952 novelette of the same name, Hitchcock simply reimagines it by using a 1961 Santa Cruz Sentinel article as “research material for his latest thriller”. – (read here). The piece itself was about a large number of seabirds unexplainably attacking the city of Capitola, California on August 18th of that year. Eventually, it turned out that the birds may have been “under the influence of domoic acid” (read here) at the time of the attacks. To further expand upon this idea, Hitchcock hired famed crime/mystery fiction writer Evan Hunter (a.k.a. Ed McBain) to write a screenplay that would effortlessly move from one tone into another. All through the first half-hour, viewers are intentionally tricked into thinking that the mood is going to play out like a sophisticated romantic comedy based on the playful banter between Melanie Daniels and Mitch Brenner. Thirty minutes into the film, that feeling more or less dissipates as it turns into something resembling a psychological drama that expands upon and rivals Psycho in it’s depiction of the darker side of a mother and son relationship. Finally, seven minutes before the second hour, it ultimately becomes an apocalyptic horror movie and a truly terrifying one at that. Hitchcock seemed to believe so himself based on the film’s legendary trailer (see below), which among other things, visually illustrates the question of “WHAT IS THE SHOCKING MYSTERY OF THE BIRDS?” across the screen. Unlike Hitchcock’s other films though, the mystery of The Birds remains unsolved and in a stroke of genius, Hitchcock and Hunter leave it up to viewers to answer the question for themselves.

Symbolically and thematically, The Birds is mainly a film about complacency as seen from director Alfred Hitchcock’s point-of-view (read here). I agree, but I am going to go one step beyond with not one, but two debatably complex interpretations. Prior to 1970, or maybe even five years earlier, one’s own praise of The Birds as Hitchcock’s most elaborate prank to date would be doing it complete justice. On the one hand, he is subtly thumbing his nose at upper class society by using the Melanie Daniels character as his target. True, Melanie may not have literally delivered the resulting chaos, but she might have done so figuratively in the form of her harmless prank involving the delivery of two lovebirds. The hysterical mother in the diner summed it up best when she said “I think you’re the cause of all of this. I think you’re evil. EVIL!” Later on and in a strange twist of irony, the birds viciously attack Melanie and this possibly gives off the vibe that her prank has backfired. On the other hand, Hitchcock does not seem too fond of small town sanctimony either. Since the plot already deals with birds violently attacking residents of a tiny village, Hitchcock is now officially left with doing nothing else but sitting back and enjoying the show like the rest of us.

Taking into consideration all of the radical changes that shaped the decade as it continued and ended, The Birds also comes off as a film that eerily foreshadowed the death of early 1960’s optimism and the slow, but steady decline of the nuclear family in a rather symbolic way. The lighthearted elements that defined the first half hour quite possibly resembles the stereotypical cheery mood that preceding American President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-1961) passed on to his successor John F. Kennedy (1961-1963), who briefly upheld this notion in the earlier days of his presidency. Contrary to the first 30 minutes, the second half hour carries a cautiously optimistic tone as we learn more about the characters. This unexpected feeling of cynicism coincides perfectly with the notable disappointments of the Kennedy era that include the failed 1961 Bay of Pigs Invasion (read here), his escalation of the Vietnam War beginning that same year (read here) and to some extent, the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis (read here). Shortly after turning into a horror movie near the end of the first hour, viewers get a fairly graphic glimpse of the birds first casualty by way of a neighboring farmer. Psychologically, our terrified reactions at this sight mirrors that of the American public’s when Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas on November 22nd, 1963 (read here). Amid all of these previous events, the status of the nuclear family suddenly began to deteriorate. Two characters in The Birds demonstrate this aspect quite powerfully. In the case of Melanie Daniels, we get a wealthy woman, who admits to Mitch Brenner that her mother ditched her and her father when she was 11 years-old for “some hotel man in the East” before getting briefly emotional about her revelation. The other one comes in the form of Mitch’s widowed mother Lydia, who wishes that she “was a stronger person.” While sipping on a cup of tea, she laments to Melanie about how much she misses her husband (whom she reveals as Frank), who was not only able to connect with Mitch and Cathy on so many levels, but whose presence always gave her a sense of security deep down. Ever since his death from four years back, Lydia has felt insecure and she painfully admits to Melanie that “it’s terrible how you, you depend on someone else for strength and then suddenly all the strength is gone and you’re alone.” In many ways, Lydia can’t help but remain dependent on Mitch because she does not want him to abandon her given how she implicitly looks upon her recent self as that of a failure. When Lydia becomes anxious on the status of the bird attacks, Mitch comes to feel like one himself when she expresses all of her worries and all he can say is “I don’t know.” A hysterical Lydia than screams something along the lines of “If only your father were here” before sincerely apologizing to him a few seconds later. One scene visually expresses this by having Mitch sitting down in front of a portrait that may be his late father. While Melanie, Lydia and Cathy are sitting down waiting for the radio news report, he sits there looking like he is struggling to be as larger than life as his father apparently was. Unlike Norman Bates in Psycho, Mitch does not really see himself as a mama’s boy. While he does love Lydia (his mother) with all his heart, at the same time, he yearns for a social life. Unfortunately, Lydia is always preventing this by interfering with his relationships like the one he had with Annie Hayworth earlier. Speaking of which, some viewers have suggested that the bird attacks represent Lydia’s rage at any woman, who attempts to form a romantic relationship with Mitch. One could even say that the ending may imply that Lydia has come to grips with accepting Mitch’s desire for a social life. This occurs in that last scene in the car where Lydia is warmly looking upon Melanie, whose head is resting on her shoulder. Based on what viewers know about Melanie’s family life, it looks like her implied wish of “a mother’s love” has finally come true. Considering all of the political and social turmoil that ended up defining that decade as a whole, The Birds strangely but subtlety comes off as something of a spiritual prequel to George A. Romero’s similarly apocalyptic (albeit lower-budgeted) horror classic Night of the Living Dead from five years later in 1968.

If Psycho served as director Alfred Hitchcock’s definition of a horror film, then The Birds serves as his redefinition of that genre. Unlike the majority of his previous films, Hitchcock uses very little music this time around to build suspense. We notice this from the opening title sequence set to nothing but the squawks of birds, who fly all over the place tearing apart each new credit a few seconds after they initially appear on the screen. Aside from sound effects, Hitchcock utilizes editing and special effects to tell the story. This is most noticeable during the last 67 minutes of the film’s 119-minute running time. The first bird attack on the town occurs at a children’s birthday party and as edited by Hitchcock’s regular editor George Tomasini, we get fast (but not too fast) back and forth cuts to emphasize all of the chaos that will embody the remainder of the film. The second major example comes when Melanie Daniels is sitting on a bench waiting for Cathy to get out of school. While the schoolchildren are heard inside singing “Risseldy Rosseldy” (read here), Melanie frequently stares back and forth at the playground and with each stare, she sees more and more crows sitting on the equipment with menacing looks on their faces. Much like the previous scene, the birds attack everybody including the children. Next up, birds attack a gas station resulting in leaking gasoline and after a man unknowingly throws a cigarette on the ground, he and the place explodes resulting in the  diner patrons to run for their lives. As Melanie hides within the telephone booth, she witnesses birds attacking a horse carriage, a man inside his car and another man getting pecked to death by birds themselves. After witnessing each instance terror, the camera cuts back and forth to a frightened Melanie. During the climax, Melanie opens a room and finds herself being pecked by an army of birds leaving her badly wounded If not dead. This sequence works as a companion piece to Psycho’s iconic shower scene based on it’s frenzied editing style. Last, but not least, credit should also be given to it’s photographic visual effects courtesy of Ub Iwerks (read here). Despite being made over 55 years ago, the imagery of the birds themselves still look timeless. Sometimes, the creatures come off as credibly scary (i.e. the crows) and other times, they look (deceivingly) harmless (i.e. the seagulls).

Along with The Shining from 17 years later, The Birds is a masterpiece of cinematic horror that allows viewers to form their own interpretations of everything they had just seen. In addition to all of that, I see The Birds as more than just my number one choice for the greatest horror film of all-time. To go one step even further, I would rank it somewhere within the top 10 range of my still unpublished blog entry of the 100 (or more) best films ever made according to me.

-(Star Rating)-
* * * * (Out of * * * *)

P.S. In case, you are interested, here is a link to the trailer of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds, which Hitchcock promoted in a way that was similar to Psycho from three years earlier.

 

John Charet’s Take On: Kiss Me Deadly (1955)

26 Wednesday Sep 2018

Posted by John Charet in 1950's Cinema, American Cinema, American Filmmakers, Cinema, Crime, Drama, Film Noir, Mystery, Robert Aldrich, Science Fiction, Thriller

≈ 28 Comments

Tags

1955, Kiss Me Deadly, Robert Aldrich

Warning: This review contains potential spoilers. If you have not seen the film then I advise you to not read any further.

Pulp novelist Mickey Spillane’s 1947 potboiler I, the Jury is not only notable for being his first novel, but it also served as our introduction to the character of Mike Hammer. Unlike the anti-heroes of Dashiell Hammett (Sam Spade) or Raymond Chandler (Philip Marlowe), detective Hammer came off as a vulgar brute and Spillane’s stories were made all the more sexier and violent as a result. Regardless of what literary critics thought about Spillane’s Hammer books, the public quickly gobbled up each entry while eagerly awaiting the next one. Eventually, Hammer would make the leap from the page to both screen and television beginning in the 1950’s with arguably hit or miss results. However, If I were to single out only one film adaptation of his as an unqualified success, it would be 1955’s Kiss Me Deadly, the sixth installment in Spillane’s Hammer series.

Los Angeles private detective Mike Hammer (Ralph Meeker) is driving on a road one night and discovers an escaped female mental patient (Cloris Leachman) on the street clad in only a trench coat and in desperate need of both help and a ride. Hammer picks her up and shortly after introducing herself as Christina and reminding him to “remember me”, she and Hammer are ambushed by what appears to be three seedy criminals. Eventually, Christina is tortured to death (offscreen) and along with a slightly unresponsive Hammer, the gang places both of them in Hammer’s car and then dumps it off the cliff leading to it’s destruction. A few days after the incident, we learn that Hammer has miraculously survived as he awakens in a hospital room. Shortly after leaving the hospital, Hammer is questioned by members of the Interstate Crime Commission in regards to the events that unfolded on that night. Hammer believes that the now deceased Christina (last name Bailey) had to be involved in “something big” as he puts it.

Ignoring the advice of his superiors, most notably that of Lt. Pat Murphy (Wesley Addy) and (later on) a stranger who warns him (via a phone message) to not go any further with the case, Mike Hammer goes out to solve the mystery. Thanks to a science reporter by the name of Ray Diker (Mort Marshall), Hammer is able to track down information on the names of Leopold Kowolsky and Nicholas Raymondo via two people: Harvey Wallace (Strother Martin) and Carmen Trivago (Fortunio Bonanova). Kowolsky is a pro fighter and Raymondo is an atomic scientist. Hammer learns from both Wallace and Trivago that along with Christina, Kowolsky and Raymondo were killed as well. In between those two meetings, Hammer is led to two gangsters by the names of Charlie Max (Jack Elam) and Sugar Smallhouse (Jack Lambert), who both work for kingpin Carl Evello (Paul Stewart). Even though the gang is responsible for the killings, at the same time, they may have been ordered to murder them by the mysterious Dr. G.E. Soberin (Albert Dekker). In addition to all of this, Hammer learns that the real name of Christina’s roommate was not Lily Carver, but Gabrielle (Gaby Rodgers) and that she was hired by Soberin to get the key from her since it belongs with the mysterious box acquired by him.

Directed and produced by the two-fisted Robert Aldrich (Vera Cruz) and written by tough as nails novelist turned screenwriter A.I. Bezzerides (Thieves’ Highway and On Dangerous Ground), Kiss Me Deadly is both intended (from Aldrich’s point of view) and unintended (from Bezzerides point of view) as a political allegory for it’s then current time period. Nevertheless, Aldrich and Bezzerides remained united in their loathing for Mickey Spillane’s 1952 novel of the same name and under the eye of Aldrich, Bezzerides was more than happy to deconstruct the source material. Likewise, Spillane reportedly hated their version of his book as well. Speaking for myself, I see Kiss Me Deadly as a 1950’s film noir with openly anti-fifties tendencies.

As entertainment, Kiss Me Deadly feels and moves like a joyride. Blissfully unaware of anything relating to political or social comment, screenwriter A.I. Bezzerides is only interested in having a lot of fun in regards to where he goes with each colorful character and situation. Coincidentally, we as the audience connect to the material in the same way he does. On film, Ralph Meeker’s portrayal of Mike Hammer comes off as the detective we hate to love. When he is not casually and suddenly roughing up a bunch of thugs; leaving another genuinely frightened, he similarly closes a desk drawer on a poor sap’s hand. If that is not enough, Hammer also tricks another thug into killing one of his own (under the false impression that he is killing Hammer). Hammer’s interrogation methods are not so much rooted in rage (though that is part of it) as much as it is in getting the job done. To put it in other words, Hammer debatably makes Harry Callahan (a.k.a. Dirty Harry) look like a Social justice warrior (SJW) by comparison. Our devilish grins at this kind of behavior feels wrong, but for some odd reason, it doesn’t thanks to the film’s extremely dry sense of dark humor. As for the women Hammer converses with on his trail, we go from Cloris Leachman’s semi-crazy, but sweet-natured Christina to Maxine Cooper’s sexy secretary Velda (Hammer’s assistant) to Marion Carr’s even sexier Friday (“a very loose woman”) and finally to Gaby Rodgers deceiving Lily Carver/Gabrielle. On a personal note, Lily Carver/Gabrielle may just be the femme fatale to end all femme fatales within the film noir genre. We (the audience) are enjoying ourselves immensely on this joyride so much that we are expectedly or unexpectedly (yet intentionally) thrown off by the explosive finale. In my view, this symbolizes the car crash made inevitable by our recklessness (i.e. by applauding all of this onscreen anarchy).

On the outside, A.I. Bezzerides script for Kiss Me Deadly may resemble the mentality of a prankster, but on the inside, it represents (by design) the work of a killjoy courtesy of director Robert Aldrich. Screenwriter Bezzerides may have had a ball writing it, but Aldrich saw it as something more radical. One might get the feeling that the overall film gives off a sense of nihilism, but a significant portion of that quite possibly stems from Aldrich’s personal feelings about the 1950’s in general. Hardboiled writer Mickey Spillane may have been a staunch anti-communist, but this fact did not stop Aldrich and Bezzerides (both left-wingers) from intentionally and unintentionally deconstructing one of his Mike Hammer books and in the process, unapologetically subverting the conformity that shaped that decade as a whole. Considering the setting’s relocation from New York (in Spillane’s novel) to Los Angeles (in Bezzerides script), this gave Aldrich the opportunity to take all of the Cold War era paranoia ripped from the headlines and bring it closer to home in more ways than one. Detective Hammer’s vigilantism (for better or worse) truly appealed to fifties readers and as nasty as he was there, he is even nastier here. Aside from violently beating up criminals simply for the sheer joy of it, Hammer reveals himself to be a sociopath as he also blackmails the men and women involved in the divorce cases he takes on. Not only that, but Hammer seems to be motivated more by self-interest than in justice for Christina Bailey. Unlike the revelation used in Spillane’s story (a briefcase supposedly full of illegal drugs), the MacGuffin here comes in the form of a glowing Pandora’s box containing deadly radioactive material. The inevitable unleashing of it is symbolic of the American public’s then current fear of nuclear war, as well as the atomic bomb and other weapons of that magnitude.

When he is not gleefully wallowing in sadism for our delight or engaging in politically charged theories, director Robert Aldrich allows us to appreciate the even finer things that Kiss Me Deadly has to offer. Shot in a gritty black-and-white by cinematographer Ernest Laszlo, the film’s tone is set close to after two minutes into the beginning as we are introduced to the opening credits scrolling backwards down instead of up while Nat King Cole’s “Rather Have the Blues” plays on detective Mike Hammer’s car radio. Cole’s song coincidentally and eerily foreshadows the chain of events Hammer (Meeker) will unexpectedly get himself into after picking up the frightened Christina Bailey (Leachman) whose life is in danger. Prior to all of this though, Hammer and Bailey share a lighthearted moment together where she gently teases him with her theory about him being one of those “self-indulgent males” who only thinks about himself. Finally getting on his nerves, a mildly annoyed Hammer hilariously tells her to “let it go.” This sweet moment only makes Bailey’s death at the hands of her pursuers all the more tragic. As viewers, we notice that this scene marks the only time that Hammer expresses his softer side even If it is all too subtle. Last, but not least, Aldrich treats us to a grand tour of what the city of Los Angeles looked like at that time. Highlights for me include (but are not limited to) some of the Bunker Hill locations (read here and here) that were torn down during the late 1960’s.

Operating under it’s thinly disguised status as the definitive Mike Hammer movie/adaptation of a Mickey Spillane property, Kiss Me Deadly actually starts off as an unconventional B film noir and for a while, that is where it seems to be heading. Once the plot gets into high gear though, it suddenly turns into an anti-noir with implicit political overtones and elements of science-fiction blended together into one. In the end, the apocalyptic Kiss Me Deadly finishes up as a genuinely unclassifiable American cult classic with a distinctive European or semi-European flavor.

-Star Rating-
* * * * (Out of * * * *)

My Favorite Takashi Miike Films

17 Monday Sep 2018

Posted by John Charet in 1990's Cinema, 2000's Cinema, 2010-Present Cinema, Action, Adventure, American Cinema, British Cinema, Cable/Television, Cinema, Comedy, Crime, Drama, Fantasy, Film Directors, Greatest, Horror, Japanese Cinema, Japanese Filmmakers, Lists, Mystery, Short Cinema, Takashi Miike, Thriller, Top 307

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

13 Assassins, Audition, Blade of the Immortal, Dead or Alive, Dead or Alive 2: Birds, Dead or Alive: Final, Fudoh: The New Generation, Hara-Kiri: Death of a Samurai, Ichi the Killer, Ley Lines, Masters of Horror (Imprint) (Cable Series), Rainy Dog, Shinjuku Triad Society, Three... Extremes (Box) (Anthology), Visitor Q

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   Audition (1999) 

2.   Ichi the Killer (2001)

3.   13 Assassins (2010)

4.   Masters of Horror (2006)
4a. Episode: “Imprint”
(Cable/Television)

5.   Three… Extremes (2004)
5a. Segment: “Box”
(Anthology Film)

* * * 1/2 (Out of * * * *)

1.   Dead or Alive 2: Birds (2000)

2.   Visitor Q (2001)

3.   Dead or Alive (1999)

4.   Hara-Kiri: Death of a Samurai (2011)

5.   Ley Lines (1999)

6.   Blade of the Immortal (2017)

7.   Rainy Dog (1997)

8.   Fudoh: The New Generation (1996)

9.   Shinjuku Triad Society (1995)

10. Dead or Alive: Final (2002)

My Favorite King Hu Films

17 Monday Sep 2018

Posted by John Charet in 1960's Cinema, 1970's Cinema, Action, Adventure, Chinese Filmmakers, Cinema, Crime, Drama, Fantasy, Film Directors, Greatest, Hong Kong Cinema, Hong Kong Filmmakers, Horror, King Hu, Lists, Mystery, Taiwanese Cinema, Taiwanese Filmmakers, Top 307, Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

A Touch of Zen, Come Drink with Me, Dragon Inn, Legend of the Mountain, Raining in the Mountain, The Fate of Lee Khan, The Valiant Ones

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   A Touch of Zen (1971)

2.   Dragon Inn (1967)

3.   Come Drink with Me (1966)

4.   The Fate of Lee Khan (1973)
(I watched it on youtube)

5.   Legend of the Mountain (1979)

6.   Raining in the Mountain (1979)
(I watched it on youtube)

7.   The Valiant Ones (1975)

Note: King Hu only partially directed The Swordsman (1990).

My Favorite Robert Wise Films

06 Thursday Sep 2018

Posted by John Charet in 1940's Cinema, 1950's Cinema, 1960's Cinema, 1970's Cinema, American Cinema, American Filmmakers, British Cinema, Cinema, Comedy, Crime, Drama, Fantasy, Film Directors, Film Noir, Greatest, Horror, Lists, Mystery, Robert Wise, Romance, Science Fiction, Sport, Thriller, Top 306

≈ 9 Comments

Tags

Executive Suite, Odds Against Tomorrow, The Andromeda Strain, The Body Snatcher, The Curse of the Cat People, The Day the Earth Stood Still 1951, The Haunting 1963, The Set-Up, This Could Be the Night

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   The Set-Up (1949)

2.   The Haunting (1963)

3.   The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951)

4.   The Curse of the Cat People (1944)

5.   The Body Snatcher (1945)

* * * 1/2 (Out of * * * *)

1.   This Could Be the Night (1957)

2.   Executive Suite (1954)

3.   Odds Against Tomorrow (1959)

4.   The Andomeda Strain (1971)

My Favorite Billy Wilder Films

06 Thursday Sep 2018

Posted by John Charet in 1940's Cinema, 1950's Cinema, 1960's Cinema, 1970's Cinema, American Cinema, American Filmmakers, Austrian Filmmakers, Billy Wilder, British Cinema, Cinema, Comedy, Crime, Drama, Film Directors, Film Noir, Greatest, Italian Cinema, Lists, Mystery, Romance, Thriller, Top 306, War

≈ 24 Comments

Tags

Ace in the Hole, Avanti!, Double Indemnity, Fedora, Kiss Me Stupid, One Two Three, Some Like It Hot, Stalag 17, Sunset Boulevard, The Apartment, The Fortune Cookie, The Major and the Minor, The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes, Witness for the Prosecution

* * * * (Out of * * * *)

1.   Avanti! (1972)

2.   Kiss Me, Stupid (1964)

3.   Some Like It Hot (1959)

4.   Ace in the Hole (1951)

5.   Sunset Boulevard (1950)

6.   Double Indemnity (1944)

7.   Fedora (1978)

8.   The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes (1970)

* * * 1/2 (Out of * * * *)

1.   Witness for the Prosecution (1957)

2.   The Major and the Minor (1942)

3.   Stalag 17 (1953)

4.   The Fortune Cookie (1966)

5.   One, Two, Three (1961)

6.   The Apartment (1960)

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Moviedrome Mondays: House of Games (1987)
  • Moviedrome Mondays: Darkman (1990)
  • Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to All of My Readers
  • Moviedrome Mondays: The Day of the Locust (1975) and The Big Knife (1955)
  • Moviedrome Mondays: Tracks (1976)

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • March 2014
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012

Categories

  • 1920's Cinema
  • 1930's Cinema
  • 1940 Comedies
  • 1940's Cinema
  • 1950's Cinema
  • 1960's Cinema
  • 1970's Cinema
  • 1980's Cinema
  • 1990's Cinema
  • 2000's Cinema
  • 2010-Present Cinema
  • 2020 Cinema
  • Abbas Kiarostami
  • Abel Gance
  • Action
  • Adventure
  • African American Cinema
  • African American Filmmakers
  • Agnes Varda
  • Akira Kurosawa
  • Alain Resnais
  • Alan Clarke
  • Alan Rudolph
  • Albert Brooks
  • Alex Cox
  • Alexander Mackendrick
  • Alfonso Cuaron
  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • Alfred L. Werker
  • Algerian Cinema
  • American Actors
  • American Cinema
  • American Film Critics
  • American Filmmakers
  • Andre De Toth
  • Andre Techine
  • Andrei Tarkovsky
  • Andrzej Wajda
  • Animation
  • Anime
  • Anthology
  • Anthology Films
  • Anthony Mann
  • Apichatpong Weerasethakul
  • Arabic Cinema
  • Argentine Filmmakers
  • Armenian Cinema
  • Arthur Penn
  • Atom Egoyan
  • Australian Cinema
  • Australian Filmmakers
  • Austrian Cinema
  • Austrian Filmmakers
  • B Cinema
  • Bela Tarr
  • Belgian Cinema
  • Belgian Filmmakers
  • Ben Wheatley
  • Bernardo Bertolucci
  • Bill Forsyth
  • Billy Wilder
  • Biography
  • Black Comedies
  • Bob Fosse
  • Bong Joon-ho
  • Box Sets
  • Brad Bird
  • Brazilian Cinema
  • Brian De Palma
  • Brian Taylor
  • British Cinema
  • British Filmmakers
  • Bruno Dumont
  • Budd Boetticher
  • Buster Keaton
  • Cable/Television
  • Canadian Cinema
  • Canadian Filmmakers
  • Carl Theodor Dreyer
  • Carlos Reygadas
  • Chantal Akerman
  • Charles Burnett
  • Charlie Chaplin
  • Chicago
  • Chinese Cinema
  • Chinese Filmmakers
  • Chris Marker
  • Christopher Guest
  • Christopher Nolan
  • Christy Lemire
  • Cinema
  • Claire Denis
  • Claude Chabrol
  • Clint Eastwood
  • Comedies
  • Comedy
  • Compilation
  • Compilations
  • Concert Films
  • Crime
  • Crime Films
  • Cristian Mungiu
  • Cuban Cinema
  • Curt Oertel
  • Czech Cinema
  • Czech Filmmakers
  • D.W. Griffith
  • Damien Chazelle
  • Danish Cinema
  • Danish Filmmakers
  • Dario Argento
  • Dariush Mehjui
  • David Cronenberg
  • David Lowery
  • David Lynch
  • David O. Russell
  • Denis Villeneuve
  • Derek Jarman
  • Discussions of Cinema
  • Docufiction
  • Documentaries
  • Documentary
  • Documentary Shorts
  • Dolly Parton
  • Don Siegel
  • Douglas Sirk
  • Drama
  • Dusan Makavejev
  • Dutch Cinema
  • Dutch Filmmakers
  • Edgar G. Ulmer
  • Edgar Wright
  • Edmund Goulding
  • Elaine May
  • Elia Kazan
  • English Filmmakers
  • Epics
  • Eric Rohmer
  • Erich von Stroheim
  • Ernst Lubitsch
  • Errol Morris
  • Ethan Coen
  • Expressionism
  • F.W. Murnau
  • Family
  • Fantasy
  • Federico Fellini
  • Film Directors
  • Film Noir
  • Finnish Cinema
  • Forbidden Season
  • Francesco Rosi
  • Francis Ford Coppola
  • Francois Truffaut
  • Frank Borzage
  • Frank Capra
  • Frank Tashlin
  • Fred C. Newmeyer
  • French Cinema
  • French Filmmakers
  • Fritz Lang
  • G.W. Pabst
  • Gangster Films
  • Gaspar Noe
  • Gene Kelly
  • Gene Siskel
  • George A. Romero
  • George Abbott
  • George Cukor
  • George Miller
  • George Stevens
  • Georges Melies
  • German Cinema
  • German Filmmakers
  • Gillo Pontecorvo
  • Greatest
  • Greek Cinema
  • Greek Filmmakers
  • Guest Entries
  • Guillermo del Toro
  • Guy Maddin
  • Harold Lloyd
  • Hayao Miyazaki
  • Henri-Georges Clouzot
  • Henry Selick
  • Hirokazu Koreeda
  • History
  • Hong Kong Cinema
  • Hong Kong Filmmakers
  • Horror
  • Hou Hsiao-hsien
  • Howard Hawks
  • Hungarian Cinema
  • Hungarian Filmmakers
  • Icelandic Cinema
  • Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
  • Indian Cinema
  • Indian Filmmakers
  • Indo Canadian Filmmakers
  • Ingmar Bergman
  • Iranian Cinema
  • Iranian Filmmakers
  • Irish Cinema
  • Italian Cinema
  • Italian Filmmakers
  • Jack Arnold
  • Jacques Becker
  • Jacques Demy
  • Jacques Rivette
  • Jacques Tati
  • Jacques Tourneur
  • Jafar Panahi
  • James Whale
  • Jan Svankmajer
  • Jan Troell
  • Jane Campion
  • Japanese Cinema
  • Japanese Filmmakers
  • Jared Hess
  • Jean Cocteau
  • Jean Renoir
  • Jean-Luc Godard
  • Jean-Pierre Melville
  • Jerry Lewis
  • Jia Zhangke
  • Jim Jarmusch
  • Joe Dante
  • Joel and Ethan Coen
  • Joel Coen
  • John Carpenter
  • John Cassavetes
  • John Ford
  • John Frankenheimer
  • John Huston
  • John Landis
  • John M. Stahl
  • John Schlesinger
  • John Waters
  • John Woo
  • Johnny Mathis
  • Jonathan Demme
  • Jordan Vogt-Roberts
  • Josef von Sternberg
  • Joseph H. Lewis
  • Joseph L. Mankiewicz
  • Jules Dassin
  • Juzo Itami
  • Kathryn Bigelow
  • Keisuke Kinoshita
  • Kelly Clarkson
  • Kelly Reichardt
  • Ken Loach
  • Ken Russell
  • Kenji Mizoguichi
  • Kenneth Anger
  • Kim Jee-Woon
  • King Hu
  • King Vidor
  • Kon Ichikawa
  • Korean Cinema
  • Korean Filmmakers
  • Krzysztof Kieslowski
  • Larry Cohen
  • Lars von Trier
  • Leo McCarey
  • Leos Carax
  • Lina Wertmuller
  • Lists
  • Louis Feuillade
  • Louis Malle
  • Luchino Visconti
  • Luis Bunuel
  • Lynne Ramsay
  • Manoel de Oliveira
  • Marcel Carne
  • Mario Bava
  • Mark Neveldine
  • Mark Robson
  • Martin Scorsese
  • Masaki Kobayashi
  • Max Ophuls
  • Mel Gibson
  • Mexican Cinema
  • Mexican Filmmakers
  • Michael Cimino
  • Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger
  • Michaelangelo Antonioni
  • Michel Gondry
  • Mike Leigh
  • Mikio Naruse
  • Miklos Jancso
  • Milos Forman
  • Miniseries
  • Mockumentary
  • Mohsen Makhmalbaf
  • Monte Hellman
  • Moviedrome
  • Music
  • Music Videos
  • Musical
  • Musicals
  • Mystery
  • Neo Noir
  • New Zealand Cinema
  • New Zealand Filmmakers
  • Nicholas Ray
  • Nick Park
  • Nicolas Roeg
  • Noah Baumbach
  • Norman Z. McLeod
  • Norwegian Cinema
  • On the Side
  • Orson Welles
  • Otto Preminger
  • Ousmane Sembene
  • P.J. Hogan
  • Park Chan-wook
  • Paul Mazursky
  • Paul Thomas Anderson
  • Paul Verhoeven
  • Pedro Almodovar
  • Performance Film
  • Peter Bogdanovich
  • Peter Jackson
  • Peter Watkins
  • Phil Karlson
  • Philip Kaufman
  • Pier Paolo Pasolini
  • Pierre Etaix
  • Polish Cinema
  • Polish Filmmakers
  • Portuguese Cinema
  • Portuguese Filmmakers
  • Pre-1920's Cinema
  • Preston Sturges
  • Quentin Tarantino
  • Rainer Werner Fassbinder
  • Raoul Walsh
  • Religious
  • Remakes
  • Rene Clair
  • Richard Fleischer
  • Richard Lester
  • Richard Linklater
  • RIchard Roeper
  • Robert Aldrich
  • Robert Altman
  • Robert Bresson
  • Robert J. Flaherty
  • Robert Lyford
  • Robert Wise
  • Roberto Rossellini
  • Roger Ebert
  • Roman Polanski
  • Romance
  • Romanian Cinema
  • Romanian Filmmakers
  • Roy Andersson
  • Russ Meyer
  • Russian Cinema
  • Russian Filmmakers
  • Sam Peckinpah
  • Sam Raimi
  • Sam Taylor
  • Samuel Fuller
  • Samurai Films
  • Satoshi Kon
  • Satyajit Ray
  • Science Fiction
  • Scottish Cinema
  • Scottish Filmmakers
  • Senegalese Cinema
  • Senegalese Filmmakers
  • Sequels
  • Serbian Cinema
  • Serbian Filmmakers
  • Sergei Eisenstein
  • Sergio Corbucci
  • Sergio Leone
  • Sergio Sollima
  • Shohei Imamura
  • Short Cinema
  • Short Film
  • Short Films
  • Sidney Lumet
  • Silent Cinema
  • Slovak Cinema
  • South Korean Cinema
  • South Korean Filmmakers
  • Soviet Cinema
  • Soviet Filmmakers
  • Spanish Cinema
  • Spanish Filmmakers
  • Special Interest
  • Spectacle
  • Spike Jonze
  • Spike Lee
  • Sport
  • Sports
  • Sports Films
  • Stanley Donen
  • Stanley Kubrick
  • Status
  • Stephen Chow
  • Steve James
  • Steven Soderbergh
  • Steven Spielberg
  • Stuart Gordon
  • Student Cinema
  • Surrealism
  • Swedish Cinema
  • Swedish Filmmakers
  • Swiss Cinema
  • Swiss Filmmakers
  • Taiwanese Cinema
  • Taiwanese Filmmakers
  • Takashi Miike
  • Ted Post
  • Television
  • Terence Davies
  • Terrence Malick
  • Terry Gilliam
  • Terry Jones
  • Terry Zwigoff
  • Thai Cinema
  • Thai Filmmakers
  • The Film Club
  • The Quay Brothers
  • Thriller
  • Thrillers
  • Tian Zhuangzhuang
  • Tobe Hooper
  • Todd Solondz
  • Tony Richardson
  • Top 10
  • Top 100
  • Top 101
  • Top 272
  • Top 304
  • Top 305
  • Top 306
  • Top 307
  • Top 308
  • Top 309
  • Top 310
  • Top 312
  • Top 313
  • Top 314
  • Tunisian Cinema
  • TV Films
  • Uncategorized
  • Victor Sjostrom
  • Vincente Minnelli
  • Vittorio de Sica
  • Walter Hill
  • War
  • War Films
  • Werner Herzog
  • Wes Anderson
  • West German Cinema
  • Western
  • Westerns
  • William Castle
  • William Friedkin
  • Wim Wenders
  • Wong Kar-wai
  • Woody Allen
  • Yasujiro Ozu
  • Yasuzo Masumura
  • Yugoslavian Cinema
  • Zack Snyder

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blogroll

  • Antagony & Ecstasy
  • Brian Tallerico
  • Chicago Film Discussion Group
  • Collin Souter
  • Combustible Celluloid
  • Criterion Collection
  • Eric Melin
  • Erik Childress
  • Farran Nehme
  • Filmspotting
  • Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
  • Jonathan Rosenbaum
  • Josh Larsen
  • Laura Emerick
  • Mark Dujsik
  • Matt Pais
  • Michael Glover Smith
  • Michael Phillips
  • Michael Wilmington
  • Nick Digilio
  • Peter Sobcynski
  • Ray Pride
  • Richard Roeper
  • Roger Ebert
  • Susan Doll
  • The Criterion Collection
  • The Dissolve

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy